Soros and Garton-Ash on Europe

Bergamo, Lombardy (Parco Regionale dei Colli)

The Consequences of the War on Terror brought George Soros and Timothy Garton Ash together a couple of weeks ago in University Church of St. Mary the Virgin, Oxford, to discuss US foreign policy, terrorism and the role of Europe. Penelope Newsome writes about it on Indymedia, but it is Caspar Hendereson as usual who gives us the most in-depth analysis.

Some of TGA’s views on Europe are well known, mainly through his Guardian columns, and I had an opportunity to write about them not long ago, when he gave a lecture at the LSE. Interestingly, Soros appears to share many of his central beliefs:

Soros thinks the EU — a far from perfect but actually existing example of an open society — can play a key role in building a more just world order, but that it needs to define a mission. As Garton-Ash was probably correct to say, the EU cannot simply keep offering membership to an ever larger number of states (although, for Soros and I guess for Garton Ash, keeping the process of negotiation with Turkey alive is crucial). Europe, Soros said, needed something new to motivate people, to “get them out on the streets” in the way the cry for freedom had in so many central and eastern European countries. [cit. C. Henderson]

I couldn’t agree more, and although I respect the efforts made by Commissioner Wallström, we’re still light-years aways from an incisive communication strategy by the EU. Engaging with civil society, like the Commission recently did in Bergamo, is important of course, but we all know the limitations of this exercise too: it is conducted in a morbidly incestuous arena, often disconnected from the people it is meant to represent, where everyone knows everyone, and where all are generally complacent towards the European Union, not just because they receive funding from it, but because they genuinely believe in those values which have created and sustained the EU so far.

The problem, of course, is to reach out to the supporters who believe in that other society: in the Vlaams Belang, which has 33.5% of voters in Antwerpen, in neo-Nazism, which mobilises voters in Germany, in the xenophobic party Sverigedemokraterna, which gets seats in half of the Swedish municipalities, in the BNP and Lega Lombarda, of which Bergamo was for a long time a stronghold. And to reach out to them, the Commission needs to adopt many more strategies that would complement the inconspicuous one it is adopting today.

A step in the right direction is this video promoted by the Speak Up Europe initiative, which has also staged on 23 November a mock trial of the EU’s trade policy:

banner2

But once again, I am not sure how many people under 30 get most of their political information from the web. Still, it’s a start. Any other suggestions out there? A prize to the most incisive idea about how to turn the idea of Europe into a mass-movement.

Advertisements

3 responses to “Soros and Garton-Ash on Europe

  1. Let’s organise a dinner to talk about this. It’s a very controversial argument.
    Europe Unite vs Russia’s threat.. Doesn’t this resemble another battle in the name of oil and power?

    Despite economically and financially EU has brought numerous benefits to individual countries, individuals and families won’t necessarily agree.

  2. Why don’t you join the GlobaLab discussion group this coming Wednesday? We could look at this, as well as other topics!

  3. Pingback: Nosemonkey / Europhobia » The EU’s mid-life crisis

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s